THIS WEEK'S QUESTION
What do you think about this bill?
Linked legislation: H.R. 10850
Checking your account and response...
Voluntary poll for participating Praveta users.
View bill ->
Preparing your Praveta Brief...
Based on official legislative actions published by Congress.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
This timeline shows the bill's position in the federal legislative process based on official congressional actions.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Praveta uses official congressional material as its source of truth. You can review the underlying record directly.
The bill would require HHS to make cancer-screening recommendations machine-readable and push EHRs and health plans to use them.
Requires a computable guideline framework within 1 year
Machine-readable logic must be interoperable with mCODE or USCDI
EHR certification rulemaking required within 5 years
HHS guidance to health plans required within 2 years
If enacted, health IT and health plans would be steered toward using standardized, machine-readable cancer-screening rules, which could make screening recommendations more consistently available through electronic systems; the source does not specify implementation details or costs.
HHS agencies, certified EHR developers, health plans (Medicaid MCOs, Medicare Advantage, exchange plans), and patients.
Introduced in the House and referred to committees; no votes or enactment recorded in the provided source.
Praveta summarizes official congressional material and keeps the underlying source available for review.